Anthony Towns (ajtowns)
-
@stewart ("%d.%d" % (1786,1)). prefix with float if you didn't want a string
-
@ysabet static char x = 'e'; return &x; /* HTH */
-
@pjf: "Should be easy." -- sounds like a variation on http://xkcd.com/349/
Friday, 04-Sep-09 06:53:09 UTC from web -
@puzzlement didn't mean to imply that you had; just a thought that crosses my mind when skimming femgeek sites. hrd2avoidmsntrptnsin140c
-
@puzzlement as a gent, it also gets a bit hard to support fem-groups when the only men that get talked about are the villains :-/ *shrug*
-
@puzzlement yeah, that. but without /some/ inoffensive nickname, you either get to be offended or not talked about as much, aka ignored...
-
@puzzlement i'd be surprised if "gals" worked much better than "chicks", but you never know. sad that i missed "dolls" vs "guys" too.
-
@puzzlement the contrast was all of the short terms for women seem likely to be taken as inoffensive, while none of the male ones would
-
@puzzlement folks, and peeps work as gender-neutral. maybe contract she-peeps to sheeps? :)
-
@puzzlement what's a one-syllable inoffensive synonym for women? girls, chicks, babes, dames... cf men, guys, dudes, blokes.
-
identi.cas untainting -- erasing instead of escaping?
Friday, 03-Jul-09 07:47:30 UTC from xmpp -
"Well-Kept Gardens Die By Pacifism", on moderation of online communities - http://ping.fm/gL9IJ
-
hat tip to @ericabiz for http://ping.fm/lljFC
-
wow, i actually like programming in BASIC, line numbers and all... how retro
-
pretty neat: http://ping.fm/CO4GI
-
fusilli crabonara = yum
-
@raena come to WWDC! you too could have your face hidden behind a bar!
-
@raena sleeveless top, necklace, and a hat -- isn't accesorising evidence of lack of Y chromosome?
-
@raena how about the person in the white top, centre of the heading banner, with their head cut off?
All Identi.ca content and data are available under the