Conversation
Notices
-
@pfctdayelise What exactly do you mean by "magic" regarding http://ur1.ca/57c48 ?
-
user pastes link (not embed code) => embedded video appears
-
It's been like that since I left the company, no? oembed and file uploads features were written at the same time.
-
We did some overhaul on that last year but it's similar; mostly does thumbnails instead of the pop-up embed view now though.
-
@brionv Out of context? Was this supposed to be a reply or a DM or something?
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@catrope Oh wait, it's API breakage. StatusNet doesn't display the @foo bit for replies anymore, but displays it differently in the UI
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
More a human interface breakage.:) Context info is there, but in Twitter-like clients it may be unclear, as most replies now don't have @.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
So, should we just prepend the "@" to the plain-text content if it's not there?
-
That's what I was thinking.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan Or should API consumers do it?
-
@brionv I wasn't implying there was nothing new, hey ;-) [I think I prefer old-style @explicit replies]
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@jasonriedy sticking it in the plain-text content on the server end is probably good for non-SN-specific clients (tho could go over limit)
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@brionv That would emulate the T-world methods... Perhaps those API endpoints could append the @-name.
-
API consumers should do it, but I think a lot don't.
-
Actually, Twitter doesn't do that for replies without an @.
-
@brionv TTYtter would be an example of a client where that would be a neat fix but limits would remain an issue
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
Interesting, thanks. Didn't know that.
-
@evan yes, that would be much better - *even* in tree-view convos which actually give most context - dent & reply can be far apart
-
It wouldn't be for the Web UI.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan until now pressing the "reply to this notice" button was the user equivalent of adding @name to the plain text of a dent
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan well, we can always repair that with a user script, can't we? ;)
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
No, it certainly wasn't.
-
@evan In the previous version of !Identica (web), when I pressed the curly arrow - "reply to this notice" button - @name appeared in msg
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan it is reasonable to assume I've misunderstood tech jargon, but that is certainly what appeared to transpire
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@laurelrusswurm actually, it still does for me in IE7
-
@evan it certainly was but it also was (and is) possible to remove it and still have the dent 'connected' to the one it's in reply to
-
@laurelrusswurm not appeared, DID. and still does for me in IE7 ;)
-
No, it wasn't equivalent. You could do one without the other, both ways.
-
One of the reasons we do things without @-replies by default is because they're confusing and jargon-y.
-
Yes! That did happen.
-
i disagree. that's like saying email is confusing. I find it much more confusing NOT knowing whose timeline and replies…
Marjolein Katsma and Brian van den Broek like this. -
@evan that reply was accidentally a perfect case in point, provided you saw it :)
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
what I see. note: no ">username" was it delivered or not? you're a busy man, i can't assume your read your entire timel…
-
one more thing to consider: I follow a small group of people in friendfeed (to see things i miss in my busier timeline …
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
Confusing and jargon-y? When so many sites use them? I think that day passed 3 years ago.
Marjolein Katsma and Brian van den Broek like this. -
@evan To me it seems essential when dents are directed. If I am in a room talking to one person, addressing other by name is optional...
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan ... when in a ballroom full of people, it's often possible to infer who is addressed by gesture, body language, eye contact...
-
@evan ... but if participating in a telephone conference call with a mere dozen, even with voice differentiation names are essential...
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan ...here we have no visual or aural cues, so potential for miscommunication increases exponentially when feeds cross bridges.
-
@evan Typing @name may have been jargony once, but I've seen it used in Facebook and CBC comments. I'll keep typing @name if not automatic
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan It seems the opposite for me. It is a message viewable by many therefore it's more confusing *without* the @name.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan replies *without* @-addressees are actually way more confusing! why make it hard on people who DO want to use @?
Marjolein Katsma and Brian van den Broek like this. -
@evan I'm glad though you said 'by default' there! so you're going to give us a choice, aren't you?
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@exador23 thanks for mentioning that use case - that's one I hadn't thought of.
-
Why would you use the @ replies, when you can see it in the post "nicknames headline", and you're able to see it in the comments "dropdown".
-
I really like not to have @ replies in the posts, because without those it looks a lot more smooth, and professional.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
@evan you still can do both - the only difference is that it's now *harder* to @-address someone if you want, and many DO want that
-
@kaspernymand have you looked at someone else's profile who doesn't use @-addr? looks like they're talking into thin air #unprofessional
-
That's why, I suggest the developers to add the "[Sender] > [Target]" post headline to the profiles too.
Marjolein Katsma likes this. -
Doesn't work for me on Chrome.
-
@kaspernymand good point - but that can't happen with 3rd party tools liek FriendFeed: they'll still lack important context
-
Maybe the API could transform the post, and add the [Target] to the outgoing post. So that FriendFeed etc. would get the post like normal.
-
@kaspernymand see here: http://identi.ca/attachment/53939373 - I'm not sure FF even uses the API; certainly others may not
-
Then they have to use it. ;-)
-
Maybe they could even make some "Tabs" on the "Profile"-pages. One called "Status", one called "Replies", one called "Repeats", etc.
-
Wow, I never expected such a long thread (compare http://millette.status.net/conversation/52512 and http://identi.ca/conversation/84262208 for instance)
-