Mike Linksvayer (mlinksva)
-
@fontana surely at the very least they have deleting in common likeness. "own" trivial to dismiss, if one wish. but yes, closeness debatable
-
I see now that #deletionist is at least a #genus, for there are at least two #species.
-
@fontana (I do realize individual articles identify a specific license. still, "a CC license" is always at least !problematic)
-
@fontana and footer "a Creative Commons license" is !disturbing; "one of the Creative Commons licenses" would be much better. ;-)
-
@fontana ... for something overlaying image, http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2012/01/08/css-text-overlay-attribution/ shows better way
-
@fontana btw I am sometimes !enraged by gratuitous but non-precise license notice ~watermark on opensource.com article header images...
-
@douglasawh amazingly 1992 very approximately equidistant from now and no sw © at all
-
@greg and good thing re non-affordability. last thing needed is another freedom tatoo to distract from surrounding tyrannical gangrene.
-
@joshuagay yeah that's what I meant in http://identi.ca/notice/90369742 but rel="license" is applicable on page describing js licenses
-
@bkuhn ... and @fontana's #contextgenocide may be what it takes for me to join them.
-
@bkuhn I agree. But mitigating this, there is a distributed backup among the lovely people who run their own instances...
-
@douglasawh same as now. abolish swpats.
-
Surely >1 plausible route to http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7559458/cte-concussion-crisis-economic-look-end-football
about 9 hours ago from web -
@greg you must be referring to the document created by @mattl's notice transcluding http://identi.ca/url/66360803 ;-)
-
@mattl it doesn't mention RDFa. The point of RDF*a* is to annotate what people see, which I agree should come first.
-
@fontana I am sad. Every interesting ~license 201[12] conversation now broken. @contextpatrol is !enraged
-
!disturbing & reason to federate & fortunately LOCKSS
-
@fontana have you deleted all your notices going back 9 months?!
-
@cwebber it isn't totally the wrong way to do it. I'd say more than halfway right. :-) More complicated than just using rel="license" though
-
@fontana I missed that, will add note tomorrow.