Replies to mxc
-
@mxc Is there somewhere I can learn more?
-
@mxc Sure, but someone has to pay for the disposal, right? It's not perfect, but at least it's closer to "pay for what you use".
-
@mxc I actually don't have a problem with that. Majesty people think about re-using bags instead of blindly dumping them in landfill.
-
@mxc Ah, but at least you get your bags packed at the supermarket, and your oil and water checked while someone puts petrol in your car. ;)
-
@mxc Redhat is self sufficient though. That might help with that argument on their side.
-
@mxc ack but centos is really making me worry... con against scientific is that they don't assure full compatibility with rhel.
-
@mxc it's a much lesser evil, but my problem with google+ is the tech, not the backer. I prefer to control my client. (see identicamode)
-
@mxc that's pretty cool
-
@mxc Would you say Scientific is any better than Cent?
-
♻ @mxc @trustzifa Centos out. But scientific linux is my distro now. Just too late♺ @brownout released centos 6, finally http://ur1.ca/4o4mj
-
@mxc evil is evil.
-
@mxc I am - I did the hashtag #meongoogleplus - maybe we can get that going
-
@mxc i think i'm the only one left who's not on g+.
-
@mxc what do you mean, on your server or something happened today?
-
♻ @mxc centos is dead. Long live scientific linux!
-
@mxc I guess its why most are moving to scientific linux which seems to have a more responsive development team, & is better updated